https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342309 The judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to disallow CENVAT credit on structural items used for supporting capital goods. Relying on precedents and statutory interpretation, the judge found the denial of credit contrary to law and allowed the appellant's appeal. The judgment was delivered by S. S. Garg, Judicial Member at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore on 24.04.2017. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 May 2017 08:57:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342309 The judge allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to disallow CENVAT credit on structural items used for supporting capital goods. Relying on precedents and statutory interpretation, the judge found the denial of credit contrary to law and allowed the appellant's appeal. The judgment was delivered by S. S. Garg, Judicial Member at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore on 24.04.2017. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342309