<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 44 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342306</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, M/s Secure Meters Ltd., in a case concerning interest liability on reversed Cenvat credit amount. The Tribunal found that the interest demand on the reversed amount was not sustainable as per Rule 6(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules and a favorable CESTAT decision. The impugned order was set aside, ruling in favor of the appellant and distinguishing the decisions cited by the Revenue as not applicable to the case at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:57:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 44 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342306</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, M/s Secure Meters Ltd., in a case concerning interest liability on reversed Cenvat credit amount. The Tribunal found that the interest demand on the reversed amount was not sustainable as per Rule 6(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules and a favorable CESTAT decision. The impugned order was set aside, ruling in favor of the appellant and distinguishing the decisions cited by the Revenue as not applicable to the case at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>