<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 42 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the original authority failed to comply with directions to verify sales prices to related and unrelated buyers, leading to an unsustainable confirmation of the demand. The appellant was granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:57:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 42 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the original authority failed to comply with directions to verify sales prices to related and unrelated buyers, leading to an unsustainable confirmation of the demand. The appellant was granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>