https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342302 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on stolen goods not physically exported. Emphasizing the significance of proof of export and customs clearance, the Tribunal rejected the Department's argument of non-export liability due to theft. Relying on factual evidence and legal precedents, the decision highlighted the importance of established export status in determining duty liability for goods, ultimately providing relief to the appellant. en-us Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Dec 2017 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342302 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on stolen goods not physically exported. Emphasizing the significance of proof of export and customs clearance, the Tribunal rejected the Department's argument of non-export liability due to theft. Relying on factual evidence and legal precedents, the decision highlighted the importance of established export status in determining duty liability for goods, ultimately providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342302