<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 34 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342296</link>
    <description>The assessee was not required to file a separate refund application as per CBEC Circular No.802/35/2004-CX, and the amount paid under Section 35(N) was considered a pre-deposit. The assessee was entitled to claim interest from three months after the court order until realization of the refund amount. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s objections and allowing the appeal by the assessee while dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 34 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342296</link>
      <description>The assessee was not required to file a separate refund application as per CBEC Circular No.802/35/2004-CX, and the amount paid under Section 35(N) was considered a pre-deposit. The assessee was entitled to claim interest from three months after the court order until realization of the refund amount. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s objections and allowing the appeal by the assessee while dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>