<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 26 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342288</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the appellant, a public sector undertaking, in a dispute over a refund claim for excess duty paid during the import of cumene. The Tribunal found that the exemption of public sector undertakings from the bar of unjust enrichment applied in this case, supported by a Chartered Accountant certificate certifying non-passing of duty burden to the buyer. The decision emphasized the significance of proving non-passing of duty burden and aligned with relevant judgments, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 26 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342288</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the appellant, a public sector undertaking, in a dispute over a refund claim for excess duty paid during the import of cumene. The Tribunal found that the exemption of public sector undertakings from the bar of unjust enrichment applied in this case, supported by a Chartered Accountant certificate certifying non-passing of duty burden to the buyer. The decision emphasized the significance of proving non-passing of duty burden and aligned with relevant judgments, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>