<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 13 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the Revenue and the Cross Objection by the assessee. It allowed the deduction of compensatory expenses, directed the assessment of capital gains in the correct assessment year, and addressed concerns to prevent double taxation of long-term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 08:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 13 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal by the Revenue and the Cross Objection by the assessee. It allowed the deduction of compensatory expenses, directed the assessment of capital gains in the correct assessment year, and addressed concerns to prevent double taxation of long-term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>