https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191874 A prior final order protecting NEET-based admissions could not be overridden by a later State cancellation, so the protected students were allowed to continue their studies. For students admitted under the State Rules, the Court used Article 142 to permit a limited, merit-based adjustment against available and transferred seats, but refused to allow any increase in intake or carry forward admissions to the next academic year. The ruling balances equitable relief with adherence to settled medical admission norms and the interests of other meritorious candidates. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Apr 2017 16:59:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191874 A prior final order protecting NEET-based admissions could not be overridden by a later State cancellation, so the protected students were allowed to continue their studies. For students admitted under the State Rules, the Court used Article 142 to permit a limited, merit-based adjustment against available and transferred seats, but refused to allow any increase in intake or carry forward admissions to the next academic year. The ruling balances equitable relief with adherence to settled medical admission norms and the interests of other meritorious candidates. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191874