https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342260 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order for service tax and penalty, stating that the issues required factual examination by the Appellate Forum. Emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory appellate remedies before approaching the High Court under Article 226, the court directed the petitioner to appeal before the CESTAT. The judgment highlights the importance of following prescribed appellate processes in fiscal matters and reiterates that tax disputes should be addressed through appropriate channels before seeking writ relief. The decision clarifies the hierarchy of forums for resolving fiscal disputes systematically. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:13:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342260 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an order for service tax and penalty, stating that the issues required factual examination by the Appellate Forum. Emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory appellate remedies before approaching the High Court under Article 226, the court directed the petitioner to appeal before the CESTAT. The judgment highlights the importance of following prescribed appellate processes in fiscal matters and reiterates that tax disputes should be addressed through appropriate channels before seeking writ relief. The decision clarifies the hierarchy of forums for resolving fiscal disputes systematically. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342260