<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1207 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as there was no suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. The test reports were deemed unreliable due to procedural deficiencies, and the classification of goods as Red Lead Oxide based on trade parlance was incorrect. As a result, the demands for duty and interest against the assessee were set aside, and the penalty imposed was also revoked. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1207 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as there was no suppression of facts or intent to evade duty. The test reports were deemed unreliable due to procedural deficiencies, and the classification of goods as Red Lead Oxide based on trade parlance was incorrect. As a result, the demands for duty and interest against the assessee were set aside, and the penalty imposed was also revoked. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>