<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191872</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on outdoor catering services used to provide food to employees in factory premises was treated as eligible for Cenvat credit as an input service, following earlier Madras HC decisions on the same issue. The Court clarified that the worker&#039;s share of the food cost was not relevant to the credit claim. On that basis, entitlement to Cenvat credit on the catering service was upheld in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191872</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on outdoor catering services used to provide food to employees in factory premises was treated as eligible for Cenvat credit as an input service, following earlier Madras HC decisions on the same issue. The Court clarified that the worker&#039;s share of the food cost was not relevant to the credit claim. On that basis, entitlement to Cenvat credit on the catering service was upheld in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>