<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342216</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- under Section 271BA for the assessee&#039;s failure to file the Audit Report in Form 3CEB as mandated by Section 92E. The Tribunal emphasized that share investments fall within the scope of Section 92E, and the failure to furnish the audit report without reasonable cause justified the penalty. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case cited by the assessee, stating it was factually different and not relevant to the penalty issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:10:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1186 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342216</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- under Section 271BA for the assessee&#039;s failure to file the Audit Report in Form 3CEB as mandated by Section 92E. The Tribunal emphasized that share investments fall within the scope of Section 92E, and the failure to furnish the audit report without reasonable cause justified the penalty. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case cited by the assessee, stating it was factually different and not relevant to the penalty issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>