<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1184 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342214</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation for the timing of TDS deduction reasonable and in compliance with contractual obligations. It was determined that there was no evidence of providing incorrect information, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1184 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342214</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation for the timing of TDS deduction reasonable and in compliance with contractual obligations. It was determined that there was no evidence of providing incorrect information, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>