<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1169 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342199</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the final order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the eligibility of outdoor caterer services for Cenvat Credit was disposed of in favor of the Assessee. Emphasizing judicial discipline, the Court upheld the principle that decisions of Larger Benches are binding on smaller benches within the Tribunal. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to precedents for consistency in legal interpretation and application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1169 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342199</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the final order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the eligibility of outdoor caterer services for Cenvat Credit was disposed of in favor of the Assessee. Emphasizing judicial discipline, the Court upheld the principle that decisions of Larger Benches are binding on smaller benches within the Tribunal. The judgment highlighted the significance of adhering to precedents for consistency in legal interpretation and application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>