https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342195 The Tribunal confirmed a duty demand of &8377; 9,04,277/- against M/s Ghankun Steels Pvt. Ltd. for clandestine removal of sponge iron but remanded the matter for further examination regarding a demand of &8377; 5,35,10,738/-. Penalties imposed on the appellant and others were set aside, emphasizing the need for a fresh examination and personal hearing. The Tribunal directed a re-examination by the adjudicating authority, ensuring procedural fairness. The judgment highlights the importance of thorough evidence examination and fair adjudication in Central Excise cases, emphasizing due process for all parties involved. en-us Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:15:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342195 The Tribunal confirmed a duty demand of &8377; 9,04,277/- against M/s Ghankun Steels Pvt. Ltd. for clandestine removal of sponge iron but remanded the matter for further examination regarding a demand of &8377; 5,35,10,738/-. Penalties imposed on the appellant and others were set aside, emphasizing the need for a fresh examination and personal hearing. The Tribunal directed a re-examination by the adjudicating authority, ensuring procedural fairness. The judgment highlights the importance of thorough evidence examination and fair adjudication in Central Excise cases, emphasizing due process for all parties involved. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342195