<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order revoking the appellant&#039;s Customs Broker License and forfeiting the security deposit. Lack of evidence linking the appellant to misdeclaration, compliance with KYC norms, and importer cooperation led to the appeal&#039;s success. The judgment stressed the necessity of concrete evidence to prove Customs Brokers&#039; wrongdoing and adherence to regulatory norms in customs procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1160 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order revoking the appellant&#039;s Customs Broker License and forfeiting the security deposit. Lack of evidence linking the appellant to misdeclaration, compliance with KYC norms, and importer cooperation led to the appeal&#039;s success. The judgment stressed the necessity of concrete evidence to prove Customs Brokers&#039; wrongdoing and adherence to regulatory norms in customs procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>