<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1152 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342182</link>
    <description>Municipal tax and penalty disputes are generally routed to the statutory appellate forum where the statute provides an efficacious remedy. A writ challenge to conservancy tax was not entertained because the dispute turned on the factual and legal validity of the levy under the municipal taxing provisions, and no exceptional ground justified bypassing appeal. Penalty or shasti under Section 267A was treated as an exaction to be determined and collected as if it were property tax, bringing it within the appellate scheme. The commentary states that writ relief should ordinarily be declined in such matters, leaving objections on merits to be pursued before the appellate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=467003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1152 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342182</link>
      <description>Municipal tax and penalty disputes are generally routed to the statutory appellate forum where the statute provides an efficacious remedy. A writ challenge to conservancy tax was not entertained because the dispute turned on the factual and legal validity of the levy under the municipal taxing provisions, and no exceptional ground justified bypassing appeal. Penalty or shasti under Section 267A was treated as an exaction to be determined and collected as if it were property tax, bringing it within the appellate scheme. The commentary states that writ relief should ordinarily be declined in such matters, leaving objections on merits to be pursued before the appellate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>