<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1132 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the denial of certain CENVAT credits but allowing the credit for housekeeping services. Regarding the rejection of part of the export turnover, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, remanding the matter for re-quantification of the export turnover and refund amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1132 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding the denial of certain CENVAT credits but allowing the credit for housekeeping services. Regarding the rejection of part of the export turnover, the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, remanding the matter for re-quantification of the export turnover and refund amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>