<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1128 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342158</link>
    <description>Functional use and product literature may determine tariff classification where a preparation is described as controlling and killing insects and pests. Dermitol C-024 was treated as an insecticide under Heading 3808.10 because its stated mode of action was to suffocate insects and prevent feeding and egg-laying. Absence of specific mention in the Insecticides Act schedule did not prevent that classification, and the product was not treated as a plant growth regulator or residual item under other headings. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. was not available, and the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1128 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342158</link>
      <description>Functional use and product literature may determine tariff classification where a preparation is described as controlling and killing insects and pests. Dermitol C-024 was treated as an insecticide under Heading 3808.10 because its stated mode of action was to suffocate insects and prevent feeding and egg-laying. Absence of specific mention in the Insecticides Act schedule did not prevent that classification, and the product was not treated as a plant growth regulator or residual item under other headings. On that basis, the exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-C.E. was not available, and the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>