https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342151 The tribunal allowed the manufacturer's appeal regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit for inputs used by a job worker in manufacturing goods on their behalf. The tribunal held that even though the inputs were not physically received at the manufacturer's factory, since they were used in the final product by the job worker, the credit should be allowed. The revenue's appeal against the denial of cenvat credit was dismissed as the tribunal found the credit admissible based on the usage of inputs by the job worker. The tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturer, allowing their appeals and dismissing the revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 15 May 2017 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342151 The tribunal allowed the manufacturer's appeal regarding the admissibility of cenvat credit for inputs used by a job worker in manufacturing goods on their behalf. The tribunal held that even though the inputs were not physically received at the manufacturer's factory, since they were used in the final product by the job worker, the credit should be allowed. The revenue's appeal against the denial of cenvat credit was dismissed as the tribunal found the credit admissible based on the usage of inputs by the job worker. The tribunal ruled in favor of the manufacturer, allowing their appeals and dismissing the revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342151