<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342137</link>
    <description>The court held that the Sales Tax Subsidy received by the Assessee did not qualify for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act as it lacked a direct nexus to the export business profits. The subsidy was considered &#039;other income&#039; and did not meet the criteria specified in Explanation (baa) of Section 80HHC. The court referenced relevant case law and concluded that the Assessee could not claim the benefit of the deduction for the Sales Tax Subsidy. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1107 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342137</link>
      <description>The court held that the Sales Tax Subsidy received by the Assessee did not qualify for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act as it lacked a direct nexus to the export business profits. The subsidy was considered &#039;other income&#039; and did not meet the criteria specified in Explanation (baa) of Section 80HHC. The court referenced relevant case law and concluded that the Assessee could not claim the benefit of the deduction for the Sales Tax Subsidy. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>