<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342136</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice dated 5.1.2016, clarifying it was a request for information and not a show cause notice for passing orders under Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act. The petition was disposed of, emphasizing the need to respond to such notices to maintain accurate records without automatically enabling authorities to pass orders under Section 201(3) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1106 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342136</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice dated 5.1.2016, clarifying it was a request for information and not a show cause notice for passing orders under Section 201(3) of the Income Tax Act. The petition was disposed of, emphasizing the need to respond to such notices to maintain accurate records without automatically enabling authorities to pass orders under Section 201(3) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>