<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191844</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed on the assessee for claiming full depreciation on trucks not put to use before a specified date, deeming it a bonafide mistake that did not warrant a penalty under section 271(1)(c). The ITAT concluded that the higher claim of depreciation due to a genuine mistake did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, citing judicial principles and case laws in support of their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1268 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191844</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed on the assessee for claiming full depreciation on trucks not put to use before a specified date, deeming it a bonafide mistake that did not warrant a penalty under section 271(1)(c). The ITAT concluded that the higher claim of depreciation due to a genuine mistake did not constitute furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income, citing judicial principles and case laws in support of their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>