https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191837 The High Court remanded the specified findings in the adjudicating authority's order dated 22.02.2016 to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, with the parties to appear before the Tribunal on 13.02.2017. It directed expeditious disposal, preferably by 31.03.2017, because the seized goods had remained in the appellant's custody for about four years. The Court expressly reserved opinion on the merits of those findings and declined to express any view on valuation and classification, leaving those issues open for determination by the Tribunal. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2017 11:21:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191837 The High Court remanded the specified findings in the adjudicating authority's order dated 22.02.2016 to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, with the parties to appear before the Tribunal on 13.02.2017. It directed expeditious disposal, preferably by 31.03.2017, because the seized goods had remained in the appellant's custody for about four years. The Court expressly reserved opinion on the merits of those findings and declined to express any view on valuation and classification, leaving those issues open for determination by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191837