<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1084 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342114</link>
    <description>In export-service refund claims, limitation must be computed in line with the export-refund scheme and not shifted merely because input service tax was paid earlier; the limitation objection was rejected. Non-registration of certain premises did not bar refund or credit where the services were actually used in exporting taxable services and the export proceeds were realised in convertible foreign exchange; the denial on that ground was set aside. Rent-a-Cab Operator Service used to transport employees for conferences or training was treated as an eligible input service because it supported business activity; the disallowance was unsustainable. The order denying rebate was set aside and refund with interest was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 18:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1084 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342114</link>
      <description>In export-service refund claims, limitation must be computed in line with the export-refund scheme and not shifted merely because input service tax was paid earlier; the limitation objection was rejected. Non-registration of certain premises did not bar refund or credit where the services were actually used in exporting taxable services and the export proceeds were realised in convertible foreign exchange; the denial on that ground was set aside. Rent-a-Cab Operator Service used to transport employees for conferences or training was treated as an eligible input service because it supported business activity; the disallowance was unsustainable. The order denying rebate was set aside and refund with interest was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>