https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342107 The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the accused, emphasizing the importance of marking the sanction order as evidence and the non-inculpatory nature of the accused's statements. The court dismissed the criminal appeal, citing the principle of double presumption in favor of the accused in appeals against acquittal. The court refused to remand the case for marking the sanction order, stating that the prosecution should not be allowed to jeopardize the liberty of the accused again. Ultimately, the appellate court confirmed the trial court's judgment of acquittal. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 14:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342107 The appellate court upheld the trial court's decision to acquit the accused, emphasizing the importance of marking the sanction order as evidence and the non-inculpatory nature of the accused's statements. The court dismissed the criminal appeal, citing the principle of double presumption in favor of the accused in appeals against acquittal. The court refused to remand the case for marking the sanction order, stating that the prosecution should not be allowed to jeopardize the liberty of the accused again. Ultimately, the appellate court confirmed the trial court's judgment of acquittal. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342107