https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342106 Preventive detention safeguards under Article 22(5) and COFEPOSA require effective communication of detention grounds and relied-upon materials, including translations where necessary, so that detenus can make meaningful representations. Separate references to abetting, smuggling and transporting may operate as distinct statutory preventive facets rather than unintelligible or contradictory grounds. Minor translation differences do not invalidate detention where the materials were served, acknowledgments obtained, and no prejudice to representation is shown. Judicial review does not reassess the adequacy of relevant detention material or subjective satisfaction absent reliance on extraneous material or withholding of relevant material that vitiates the decision. Section 5A supports severability of detention grounds. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:11:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342106 Preventive detention safeguards under Article 22(5) and COFEPOSA require effective communication of detention grounds and relied-upon materials, including translations where necessary, so that detenus can make meaningful representations. Separate references to abetting, smuggling and transporting may operate as distinct statutory preventive facets rather than unintelligible or contradictory grounds. Minor translation differences do not invalidate detention where the materials were served, acknowledgments obtained, and no prejudice to representation is shown. Judicial review does not reassess the adequacy of relevant detention material or subjective satisfaction absent reliance on extraneous material or withholding of relevant material that vitiates the decision. Section 5A supports severability of detention grounds. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342106