https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342106 Preventive detention is upheld where the detention order and grounds are intelligible in statutory context, the detaining authority has considered relevant materials, and the language used does not show non-application of mind. The note states that effective communication under Article 22(5) and Section 3(3) of the COFEPOSA Act is satisfied when the detenus receive the order, grounds, relied upon documents and Malayalam translations, with acknowledgments, and minor translation variations do not by themselves establish prejudice. It further states that alleged omission of additional materials does not vitiate detention where the relied upon material is sufficient and Section 5A severability applies. en-us Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:11:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342106 Preventive detention is upheld where the detention order and grounds are intelligible in statutory context, the detaining authority has considered relevant materials, and the language used does not show non-application of mind. The note states that effective communication under Article 22(5) and Section 3(3) of the COFEPOSA Act is satisfied when the detenus receive the order, grounds, relied upon documents and Malayalam translations, with acknowledgments, and minor translation variations do not by themselves establish prejudice. It further states that alleged omission of additional materials does not vitiate detention where the relied upon material is sufficient and Section 5A severability applies. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342106