<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 4,68,870/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as it was based on estimated values without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deemed unjustified, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, resulting in the penalty order being quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:09:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1059 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 4,68,870/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, as it was based on estimated values without concrete evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deemed unjustified, and the Assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, resulting in the penalty order being quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>