<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (9) TMI 69 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191828</link>
    <description>For tax purposes, the real substance of a transaction prevails over its form. A bus transaction described as hire-purchase was examined against the surrounding facts, and because the vehicle remained in the assessee&#039;s name, with registration and permit continuing with him and no effective transfer of ownership to the financier, the arrangement was treated as a loan secured on the bus rather than a true sale. The clause providing for title to pass only on final instalment payment and a nominal Re. 1 was viewed as a security device. The assessee was therefore regarded as owner during the relevant period and entitled to development rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (9) TMI 69 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191828</link>
      <description>For tax purposes, the real substance of a transaction prevails over its form. A bus transaction described as hire-purchase was examined against the surrounding facts, and because the vehicle remained in the assessee&#039;s name, with registration and permit continuing with him and no effective transfer of ownership to the financier, the arrangement was treated as a loan secured on the bus rather than a true sale. The clause providing for title to pass only on final instalment payment and a nominal Re. 1 was viewed as a security device. The assessee was therefore regarded as owner during the relevant period and entitled to development rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>