https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191827 The appeals were allowed as the ITAT found that assessing the assessee as AOP instead of PFAS was not prejudicial to revenue, and the CIT was not justified in setting aside the assessment order. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:58:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191827 The appeals were allowed as the ITAT found that assessing the assessee as AOP instead of PFAS was not prejudicial to revenue, and the CIT was not justified in setting aside the assessment order. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191827