<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 266 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191826</link>
    <description>On takeover of a private medical college under the Bihar Private Medical Colleges (Taking Over) Act, 1978, a teacher&#039;s contractual claim to continue until age 62 did not survive the statutory scheme. Section 3 vested the college&#039;s assets and obligations in the State, while section 6 specifically governed the post-takeover position of teaching staff and other employees. Once the notified order took effect, staff ceased to be employees of the college body and were continued only on an ad hoc basis pending State decision. The State&#039;s power under section 6 to redetermine service conditions was held wide enough to cover superannuation age, and termination of the ad hoc service was valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:55:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 266 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191826</link>
      <description>On takeover of a private medical college under the Bihar Private Medical Colleges (Taking Over) Act, 1978, a teacher&#039;s contractual claim to continue until age 62 did not survive the statutory scheme. Section 3 vested the college&#039;s assets and obligations in the State, while section 6 specifically governed the post-takeover position of teaching staff and other employees. Once the notified order took effect, staff ceased to be employees of the college body and were continued only on an ad hoc basis pending State decision. The State&#039;s power under section 6 to redetermine service conditions was held wide enough to cover superannuation age, and termination of the ad hoc service was valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>