<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1048 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342078</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on courier and transportation services was allowed for exported goods delivered on Delivered Duty Paid terms because the place of removal was treated as extending to the foreign buyer&#039;s premises. The seller retained ownership and bore cost and risk until delivery, so the transport services up to destination formed part of the export transaction. The authority relied on by the Revenue was held inapplicable on these facts, while the earlier precedent supporting credit on transport to the buyer&#039;s doorstep was found satisfied. Credit was therefore admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1048 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342078</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on courier and transportation services was allowed for exported goods delivered on Delivered Duty Paid terms because the place of removal was treated as extending to the foreign buyer&#039;s premises. The seller retained ownership and bore cost and risk until delivery, so the transport services up to destination formed part of the export transaction. The authority relied on by the Revenue was held inapplicable on these facts, while the earlier precedent supporting credit on transport to the buyer&#039;s doorstep was found satisfied. Credit was therefore admissible, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>