<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1205 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191813</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for fresh consideration by the original authority concerning the fixation of brand rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995. The rejection of the application by the Commissioner was set aside, emphasizing the need to review the application process, condonation of delay, and Shipping Bill declaration in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:15:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1205 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191813</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter for fresh consideration by the original authority concerning the fixation of brand rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995. The rejection of the application by the Commissioner was set aside, emphasizing the need to review the application process, condonation of delay, and Shipping Bill declaration in accordance with the Tribunal&#039;s observations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>