<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1188 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191815</link>
    <description>A composite contract for laying underground cables, including trenching, road cutting, installation, commissioning and allied civil work with materials, falls within the statutory concept of a works contract and not mere labour or job work. The broad definition of works contract covers installation and commissioning, and the dominant intention test is not applied where the contract otherwise contains those elements. The article also notes that penalty for failure to deduct tax is attracted on non-deduction itself, without proof of mens rea, and cannot be reduced where no material is furnished to bifurcate the taxable component of the contract value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1188 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191815</link>
      <description>A composite contract for laying underground cables, including trenching, road cutting, installation, commissioning and allied civil work with materials, falls within the statutory concept of a works contract and not mere labour or job work. The broad definition of works contract covers installation and commissioning, and the dominant intention test is not applied where the contract otherwise contains those elements. The article also notes that penalty for failure to deduct tax is attracted on non-deduction itself, without proof of mens rea, and cannot be reduced where no material is furnished to bifurcate the taxable component of the contract value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>