<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1045 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the goods imported before the amendment to the Steel and Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2012, did not require Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification. The judgment emphasized the non-retrospective application of the amendment and overturned the confiscation and penalty imposed on the appellant, providing relief in the appeal concerning the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1045 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the goods imported before the amendment to the Steel and Steel Products (Quality Control) Order, 2012, did not require Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification. The judgment emphasized the non-retrospective application of the amendment and overturned the confiscation and penalty imposed on the appellant, providing relief in the appeal concerning the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>