<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (8) TMI 11 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7625</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the disputed land was not considered agricultural land for the Wealth-tax Act due to insufficient evidence of agricultural use on the valuation date. The land&#039;s location in a residential area and its high sale price supported this conclusion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, ruling against the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (8) TMI 11 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7625</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the disputed land was not considered agricultural land for the Wealth-tax Act due to insufficient evidence of agricultural use on the valuation date. The land&#039;s location in a residential area and its high sale price supported this conclusion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, ruling against the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>