<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1035 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342065</link>
    <description>A revisional order under section 263 was held unsustainable where it went beyond the show-cause notice and sought to disturb an assessment completed after specific enquiries; revision cannot rest on a mere change of opinion when the Assessing Officer had adopted a plausible view after hearing the assessee. On treaty relief, dividend income received in Oman qualified for deemed tax credit under Article 25(4) of the India-Oman DTAA read with section 90 because the Omani exemption was shown to be a tax incentive linked to economic development, and the competent foreign clarification plus consistent prior treatment supported that view. The revision failed and treaty credit was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1035 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342065</link>
      <description>A revisional order under section 263 was held unsustainable where it went beyond the show-cause notice and sought to disturb an assessment completed after specific enquiries; revision cannot rest on a mere change of opinion when the Assessing Officer had adopted a plausible view after hearing the assessee. On treaty relief, dividend income received in Oman qualified for deemed tax credit under Article 25(4) of the India-Oman DTAA read with section 90 because the Omani exemption was shown to be a tax incentive linked to economic development, and the competent foreign clarification plus consistent prior treatment supported that view. The revision failed and treaty credit was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>