<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The law laid down by jurisdictional High Court being binding, prima facie adjustments can be made in order u/s 143(1) even if issue is debatable – so held by the Supreme Court also a case showing double standard followed by tax authorities increasing litigation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7387</link>
    <description>Where a jurisdictional High Court has declared the law on a tax question, assessing officers may make prima facie adjustments under section 143(1) consistent with that binding precedent even if the issue is debatable. The Supreme Court applied that principle to allow an AO&#039;s prima facie treatment of disputed expenditure as capital with amortisation, reversing lower authorities that had declined such adjustments on the ground of debatable issues. Taxpayers are advised to follow binding precedent in returns and tender alternative claims for AO consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:11:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The law laid down by jurisdictional High Court being binding, prima facie adjustments can be made in order u/s 143(1) even if issue is debatable – so held by the Supreme Court also a case showing double standard followed by tax authorities increasing litigation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7387</link>
      <description>Where a jurisdictional High Court has declared the law on a tax question, assessing officers may make prima facie adjustments under section 143(1) consistent with that binding precedent even if the issue is debatable. The Supreme Court applied that principle to allow an AO&#039;s prima facie treatment of disputed expenditure as capital with amortisation, reversing lower authorities that had declined such adjustments on the ground of debatable issues. Taxpayers are advised to follow binding precedent in returns and tender alternative claims for AO consideration.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:11:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>