https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191810 An FL3 licence application required reconsideration because the competent authority had not taken a final decision on the available records, and the matter had to be examined in light of fresh reports and the amended Rule 13(3) of the Foreign Liquor Rules. The question whether any vested right arose from pendency or an earlier recommendation was left to the authority to decide in the first instance. Since no final administrative determination had been made on the relevant materials, eligibility was not adjudicated by the court. The respondents were directed to reconsider the application promptly after applying the changed legal position and granting the applicant a personal hearing. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:48:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191810 An FL3 licence application required reconsideration because the competent authority had not taken a final decision on the available records, and the matter had to be examined in light of fresh reports and the amended Rule 13(3) of the Foreign Liquor Rules. The question whether any vested right arose from pendency or an earlier recommendation was left to the authority to decide in the first instance. Since no final administrative determination had been made on the relevant materials, eligibility was not adjudicated by the court. The respondents were directed to reconsider the application promptly after applying the changed legal position and granting the applicant a personal hearing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191810