<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1266 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191804</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution for cheating was treated as unsustainable where the same transaction had already been dealt with under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, the penalty and tax had been recovered, and the goods and vehicle had been released. On those facts, continuation of the FIR and related proceedings was held to serve no useful purpose and to amount to abuse of process of law, so the criminal case was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1266 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191804</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution for cheating was treated as unsustainable where the same transaction had already been dealt with under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, the penalty and tax had been recovered, and the goods and vehicle had been released. On those facts, continuation of the FIR and related proceedings was held to serve no useful purpose and to amount to abuse of process of law, so the criminal case was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>