<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1012 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342042</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s additions of Rs. 25,73,500/- for unexplained cash deposits and Rs. 31,565/- for differential interest. The appellant, a company director, failed to sufficiently prove the sources of these amounts despite presenting evidence. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence provided and deemed the explanations inadequate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 07:23:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1012 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342042</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s additions of Rs. 25,73,500/- for unexplained cash deposits and Rs. 31,565/- for differential interest. The appellant, a company director, failed to sufficiently prove the sources of these amounts despite presenting evidence. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence provided and deemed the explanations inadequate, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>