<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (7) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7614</link>
    <description>A mere change of a company&#039;s name does not alter its legal personality or create a new entity; the company remains the same juristic person with its rights, obligations and liabilities intact. On that footing, assets held by a bank for the company under its former name continue to belong to the same company after the name change, and the income-tax authorities may validly proceed to recover assessed tax by notice to the bank without treating the matter as succession or requiring a fresh assessment in the new name. Section 26 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, was held inapplicable because there was no substitution of one legal person by another.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (7) TMI 13 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7614</link>
      <description>A mere change of a company&#039;s name does not alter its legal personality or create a new entity; the company remains the same juristic person with its rights, obligations and liabilities intact. On that footing, assets held by a bank for the company under its former name continue to belong to the same company after the name change, and the income-tax authorities may validly proceed to recover assessed tax by notice to the bank without treating the matter as succession or requiring a fresh assessment in the new name. Section 26 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, was held inapplicable because there was no substitution of one legal person by another.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>