<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Gujarat High Court rules advertisement and public issue expenses as capital expenditure u/s 143(1), binding in Gujarat.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34487</link>
    <description>Prim-facie adjustment u/s 143(1) intimation - Expenditure on advertisement and public issue - Even though it is a debatable issue but as Gujarat High Court had taken a view that it is capital expenditure, and the registered office of the respondent assessee being in the State of Gujarat, the law laid down by the Gujarat High Court was binding. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:42:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:42:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466633" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gujarat High Court rules advertisement and public issue expenses as capital expenditure u/s 143(1), binding in Gujarat.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34487</link>
      <description>Prim-facie adjustment u/s 143(1) intimation - Expenditure on advertisement and public issue - Even though it is a debatable issue but as Gujarat High Court had taken a view that it is capital expenditure, and the registered office of the respondent assessee being in the State of Gujarat, the law laid down by the Gujarat High Court was binding. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:42:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>