<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1001 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority to analyze the appellant&#039;s representation of relinquishing title of goods, impacting duty recovery. The impugned order was modified, emphasizing the need to address the issue of title relinquishment and its impact on duty recovery. The appeal was allowed through remand, highlighting complexities in provisional assessment, duty confirmation, and implications of title relinquishment under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1001 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority to analyze the appellant&#039;s representation of relinquishing title of goods, impacting duty recovery. The impugned order was modified, emphasizing the need to address the issue of title relinquishment and its impact on duty recovery. The appeal was allowed through remand, highlighting complexities in provisional assessment, duty confirmation, and implications of title relinquishment under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>