<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 996 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342026</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute where the Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter for re-adjudication due to procedural irregularities, specifically the delayed submission of Challans. The Revenue challenged the remand, citing a post-amendment restriction on the Commissioner&#039;s remand power. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the remand order, emphasizing the need to verify the genuineness of the appellants&#039; claims regarding tax deposits. The decision dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and directed a re-hearing by the Adjudicating Authority to allow the appellants to substantiate their contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 996 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342026</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute where the Commissioner (Appeals) remanded the matter for re-adjudication due to procedural irregularities, specifically the delayed submission of Challans. The Revenue challenged the remand, citing a post-amendment restriction on the Commissioner&#039;s remand power. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the remand order, emphasizing the need to verify the genuineness of the appellants&#039; claims regarding tax deposits. The decision dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and directed a re-hearing by the Adjudicating Authority to allow the appellants to substantiate their contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>