<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 992 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342022</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeals by remanding the case for further examination. It directed a reevaluation of the refund claims for unutilized credit related to services exported under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS), considering the nature of services provided and relevant legal precedents. The Tribunal set aside the Orders-in-Appeal and provided the respondent-assessees with an opportunity to submit additional evidence if required for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 992 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342022</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeals by remanding the case for further examination. It directed a reevaluation of the refund claims for unutilized credit related to services exported under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS), considering the nature of services provided and relevant legal precedents. The Tribunal set aside the Orders-in-Appeal and provided the respondent-assessees with an opportunity to submit additional evidence if required for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342022</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>