<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 988 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342018</link>
    <description>Clearances by a 100% Export Oriented Unit against Advance Release Orders were treated as eligible for exemption from additional customs duty and related levies under Notification No. 82/92-CE, because the notification was construed harmoniously with the Export-Import Policy and the duty-free supply scheme it implemented. The prescribed removal procedure was also held to have been substantially complied with, where the Advance Release Order was submitted to the jurisdictional authorities, goods were removed under AR3A, documents were delivered, the department was intimated, and clearances and consumption statements were verified. As a result, the demand, penalties and interest were held unsustainable and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 988 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342018</link>
      <description>Clearances by a 100% Export Oriented Unit against Advance Release Orders were treated as eligible for exemption from additional customs duty and related levies under Notification No. 82/92-CE, because the notification was construed harmoniously with the Export-Import Policy and the duty-free supply scheme it implemented. The prescribed removal procedure was also held to have been substantially complied with, where the Advance Release Order was submitted to the jurisdictional authorities, goods were removed under AR3A, documents were delivered, the department was intimated, and clearances and consumption statements were verified. As a result, the demand, penalties and interest were held unsustainable and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>