https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342014 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order from the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Jaipur. The decision focused on the interpretation of sales tax abatement provisions for Central Excise valuation under Section 4(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized that set-off schemes of sales tax did not alter the rate of sales tax payable on finished goods and only the amount legally permissible under local sales tax law could be claimed as abatement. The ruling highlighted the importance of accurate calculation and compliance with local sales tax laws for Central Excise valuation purposes. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342014 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order from the Commissioner (Appeals-I), Jaipur. The decision focused on the interpretation of sales tax abatement provisions for Central Excise valuation under Section 4(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal emphasized that set-off schemes of sales tax did not alter the rate of sales tax payable on finished goods and only the amount legally permissible under local sales tax law could be claimed as abatement. The ruling highlighted the importance of accurate calculation and compliance with local sales tax laws for Central Excise valuation purposes. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342014