<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 983 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342013</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, who are manufacturers of pipes and tubes, regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on Goods Transport Agency Service for outward transportation of goods beyond the place of removal. Citing the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, interpreting outward transport service as falling within the definition of &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned orders, granting the appellants entitlement to consequential benefits and emphasizing a broad interpretation of input services for Cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 06:55:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 983 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342013</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the appellants, who are manufacturers of pipes and tubes, regarding the eligibility of Cenvat credit on Goods Transport Agency Service for outward transportation of goods beyond the place of removal. Citing the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, the tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, interpreting outward transport service as falling within the definition of &quot;input service&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the impugned orders, granting the appellants entitlement to consequential benefits and emphasizing a broad interpretation of input services for Cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>