<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 980 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342010</link>
    <description>The Tribunal refrained from making a final decision on the appeal regarding the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue Show Cause Notices under the Customs Act, 1962, due to the sub judice status of the Mangali Impex case. The appellant was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal again after the Supreme Court&#039;s final verdict in the Mangali Impex case. The appeal was disposed of with this liberty, and the Miscellaneous Application was also disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2019 12:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=466593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 980 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342010</link>
      <description>The Tribunal refrained from making a final decision on the appeal regarding the jurisdiction of DRI officers to issue Show Cause Notices under the Customs Act, 1962, due to the sub judice status of the Mangali Impex case. The appellant was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal again after the Supreme Court&#039;s final verdict in the Mangali Impex case. The appeal was disposed of with this liberty, and the Miscellaneous Application was also disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=342010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>